Skip to content

Should I get Scarpa Veloce L or Ocún Advancer LU?

General Climbing
  • I’m a beginner climber and I got Evolv Shamans in my street size a few weeks ago since I read good reviews about them and I got them pretty cheap as they were in the discounted section of my local climbing shop, but only in that size. They’ve been great at allowing me to stand on small edges and get better height on my toes due to the thick rand, but they hurt like hell to wear, making the benefits I gain from using them somewhat moot, as I’m not able to climb and improve as much as I’d like to.

    I’ve been wearing them around the house in addition to the gym in the hopes of breaking them in quicker (I’ve had to wear plastic bags on my feet to prevent blisters on my heels and toes from excessive friction) and I noticed they don’t really seem to have broken in that much and still hurt my toes a lot (especially the tops of my big toes), so I’d like some recommendations for the next pair that I get.

    I have Morton’s toe/Greek feet and my feet are probably wider and less-arched than average. I’d like to get a more comfortable pair for long gym sessions, so I think I’d prefer lace-up shoes in the future. I’ve narrowed my choices down to the Scarpa Veloce L and the Ocún Advancer LU, both of which are lace-up, apparently suited for Greek feet, and are vegan. I’d appreciate some comparisons if people have experience with them, or if you have recommendations for other shoes that might suit my criteria better, please share them too!

  • I’m a beginner climber and I got Evolv Shamans in my street size a few weeks ago since I read good reviews about them and I got them pretty cheap as they were in the discounted section of my local climbing shop, but only in that size. They’ve been great at allowing me to stand on small edges and get better height on my toes due to the thick rand, but they hurt like hell to wear, making the benefits I gain from using them somewhat moot, as I’m not able to climb and improve as much as I’d like to.

    I’ve been wearing them around the house in addition to the gym in the hopes of breaking them in quicker (I’ve had to wear plastic bags on my feet to prevent blisters on my heels and toes from excessive friction) and I noticed they don’t really seem to have broken in that much and still hurt my toes a lot (especially the tops of my big toes), so I’d like some recommendations for the next pair that I get.

    I have Morton’s toe/Greek feet and my feet are probably wider and less-arched than average. I’d like to get a more comfortable pair for long gym sessions, so I think I’d prefer lace-up shoes in the future. I’ve narrowed my choices down to the Scarpa Veloce L and the Ocún Advancer LU, both of which are lace-up, apparently suited for Greek feet, and are vegan. I’d appreciate some comparisons if people have experience with them, or if you have recommendations for other shoes that might suit my criteria better, please share them too!

    I’ve not tried the Ocúns, so I can’t compare, but I can definitely recommend the Veloces for wide feet. Definitely the most comfortable climbing shoes I’ve worn!

  • I’m a beginner climber and I got Evolv Shamans in my street size a few weeks ago since I read good reviews about them and I got them pretty cheap as they were in the discounted section of my local climbing shop, but only in that size. They’ve been great at allowing me to stand on small edges and get better height on my toes due to the thick rand, but they hurt like hell to wear, making the benefits I gain from using them somewhat moot, as I’m not able to climb and improve as much as I’d like to.

    I’ve been wearing them around the house in addition to the gym in the hopes of breaking them in quicker (I’ve had to wear plastic bags on my feet to prevent blisters on my heels and toes from excessive friction) and I noticed they don’t really seem to have broken in that much and still hurt my toes a lot (especially the tops of my big toes), so I’d like some recommendations for the next pair that I get.

    I have Morton’s toe/Greek feet and my feet are probably wider and less-arched than average. I’d like to get a more comfortable pair for long gym sessions, so I think I’d prefer lace-up shoes in the future. I’ve narrowed my choices down to the Scarpa Veloce L and the Ocún Advancer LU, both of which are lace-up, apparently suited for Greek feet, and are vegan. I’d appreciate some comparisons if people have experience with them, or if you have recommendations for other shoes that might suit my criteria better, please share them too!

    Can you not try them on? You did mention a local climbing shop after all… I would not recommend buying shoes without having tried them on, much less to a beginner.

  • Can you not try them on? You did mention a local climbing shop after all… I would not recommend buying shoes without having tried them on, much less to a beginner.

    I don’t recall the shop having the Advancer or the lace up version of the Veloce, but I do remember trying out velcro Veloces which did feel more comfortable. At the end I went with the pair of Shamans because they were cheap, didn’t feel too uncomfortable at the time and I thought they would break in more than they have so far. Definitely realise my mistake with that decision now though hah.

  • I’m a beginner climber and I got Evolv Shamans in my street size a few weeks ago since I read good reviews about them and I got them pretty cheap as they were in the discounted section of my local climbing shop, but only in that size. They’ve been great at allowing me to stand on small edges and get better height on my toes due to the thick rand, but they hurt like hell to wear, making the benefits I gain from using them somewhat moot, as I’m not able to climb and improve as much as I’d like to.

    I’ve been wearing them around the house in addition to the gym in the hopes of breaking them in quicker (I’ve had to wear plastic bags on my feet to prevent blisters on my heels and toes from excessive friction) and I noticed they don’t really seem to have broken in that much and still hurt my toes a lot (especially the tops of my big toes), so I’d like some recommendations for the next pair that I get.

    I have Morton’s toe/Greek feet and my feet are probably wider and less-arched than average. I’d like to get a more comfortable pair for long gym sessions, so I think I’d prefer lace-up shoes in the future. I’ve narrowed my choices down to the Scarpa Veloce L and the Ocún Advancer LU, both of which are lace-up, apparently suited for Greek feet, and are vegan. I’d appreciate some comparisons if people have experience with them, or if you have recommendations for other shoes that might suit my criteria better, please share them too!

    Shamans are famously a very comfortable aggressive shoe. But also talked longer than most to break in.

    Evolvs tend to be similar to street size. When they first go on they should be very difficult to get on and really restrict your foot. After a few mins, the tightness and pain should be really uncomfortable and you will want to take them off. However, after sitting with them on in a bucket of warm water and walking around the house a bit, or after a few sessions at the boulder gym leaving them on for longer periods, they will fit like a glove. When breaking in, a shoe should always expand to your foot, until they’re like a second skin. You should never get friction or slip issues ever.

    Blisters: This is unusual. Evolvs tend to be nicer for wider feet. As I said, your shoe should be so snug there is no friction at all so you shouldn’t ever get blisters. It sounds like your shoe size is actually too big, or your foot doesn’t fill-out the inside of Evolvs well, like wide toes but narrow heel. Shamans are prone to heel-slip when they get to the end of their life, but you’re looking at at least one re-sole before that happens.

    You should be adjusting the straps to prevent this. Mine were very latched down on top, fairly loose on middle, moderate on toe, and this is what I have with most straps and lacing. It will probably be different for you. Each strap does different jobs and work in combination.

    Sore toe: When you say “top of big toes” do you mean toenail area or knuckle?

    If it’s toenail, this is pretty normal and you’ll need to clip them down. In aggressive shoes, you’re curling up the toes in the toe box in such a shape that it promotes using the tips of your toes which leads to the toenail taking a fair bit of pressure. It’s not the shoe, it’s just what happens on toe-tips. Be thankful you don’t do ballet.

    If it’s the knuckle, your toes aren’t filling out the toe box well. In aggressive shoes, the knuckle presses hard against the toe box and needs every other part of the toes to be snuggly pressing the walls too to even out the pressure and not cause a hotspot. Both too much room and too little room cause this. Too much and the knuckle does all the work. Too little and the knuckle has no where to go and you get the infamous “La Sportiva bump” start growing. This can be fixed by taping hotspot areas, forcing the box to stretch out more over time until you no longer need the tape.

    Scarpa: If you have wide feet, you probably won’t fit a Scarpa. I have wide feet and cannot. I use mostly La Sportiva, Red Chili, and Evolv.

    Vegan: Everyone has their views. Personally, I’m more a nature nut and synthetic shoes are obviously terrible for the environment. Most leather shoes, like La Sportiva, use leather from things like animals that have already been culled for environmental reasons. So as an environmentalist, I tend to avoid vegan shoes. This may be worth keeping in mind if you were under the impression that they’re all commercially farmed leather.

    Edit: Also keep in mind synthetic shoes take much longer to break in. You can speed this up with more heat, such as the wearing them in a tub of hot water trick. Fill up a tub, put on the shoes, put on an episode or two of Rick & Morty, and try not to think about the pain.

    Recommendations: Well for starters, you need to try shoes on. Your foot decides the shoe, not you. Do it the other way around and you’ll never habe happy climbing feet.

    I’m 11 US and currently mostly use…

    La Sportiva Skwama 42/9 (Aggressive bouldering/cave)
    La Sportiva Testarossa 42.5/9.5 (Aggressive lead/cave
    La Sportiva Katana 42/9 (Casual lead and multis)
    Red Chili Voltage 44/10.5 (90% of bouldering)

    I have old Evolvs and Red Chilis for easy gym days or training. Unfortunately I can’t remember what my Shamans were.

    After my second pair of shoes, I never made the mistake of not trying things on first. I also stick to my main three brands as they seem to be best for my feet. Your feet decide your brand.

    Edit: I’ve also been advised Tanaya should be really good for me, but haven’t tried any as they’re a bit hard to source here to try on.

  • Shamans are famously a very comfortable aggressive shoe. But also talked longer than most to break in.

    Evolvs tend to be similar to street size. When they first go on they should be very difficult to get on and really restrict your foot. After a few mins, the tightness and pain should be really uncomfortable and you will want to take them off. However, after sitting with them on in a bucket of warm water and walking around the house a bit, or after a few sessions at the boulder gym leaving them on for longer periods, they will fit like a glove. When breaking in, a shoe should always expand to your foot, until they’re like a second skin. You should never get friction or slip issues ever.

    Blisters: This is unusual. Evolvs tend to be nicer for wider feet. As I said, your shoe should be so snug there is no friction at all so you shouldn’t ever get blisters. It sounds like your shoe size is actually too big, or your foot doesn’t fill-out the inside of Evolvs well, like wide toes but narrow heel. Shamans are prone to heel-slip when they get to the end of their life, but you’re looking at at least one re-sole before that happens.

    You should be adjusting the straps to prevent this. Mine were very latched down on top, fairly loose on middle, moderate on toe, and this is what I have with most straps and lacing. It will probably be different for you. Each strap does different jobs and work in combination.

    Sore toe: When you say “top of big toes” do you mean toenail area or knuckle?

    If it’s toenail, this is pretty normal and you’ll need to clip them down. In aggressive shoes, you’re curling up the toes in the toe box in such a shape that it promotes using the tips of your toes which leads to the toenail taking a fair bit of pressure. It’s not the shoe, it’s just what happens on toe-tips. Be thankful you don’t do ballet.

    If it’s the knuckle, your toes aren’t filling out the toe box well. In aggressive shoes, the knuckle presses hard against the toe box and needs every other part of the toes to be snuggly pressing the walls too to even out the pressure and not cause a hotspot. Both too much room and too little room cause this. Too much and the knuckle does all the work. Too little and the knuckle has no where to go and you get the infamous “La Sportiva bump” start growing. This can be fixed by taping hotspot areas, forcing the box to stretch out more over time until you no longer need the tape.

    Scarpa: If you have wide feet, you probably won’t fit a Scarpa. I have wide feet and cannot. I use mostly La Sportiva, Red Chili, and Evolv.

    Vegan: Everyone has their views. Personally, I’m more a nature nut and synthetic shoes are obviously terrible for the environment. Most leather shoes, like La Sportiva, use leather from things like animals that have already been culled for environmental reasons. So as an environmentalist, I tend to avoid vegan shoes. This may be worth keeping in mind if you were under the impression that they’re all commercially farmed leather.

    Edit: Also keep in mind synthetic shoes take much longer to break in. You can speed this up with more heat, such as the wearing them in a tub of hot water trick. Fill up a tub, put on the shoes, put on an episode or two of Rick & Morty, and try not to think about the pain.

    Recommendations: Well for starters, you need to try shoes on. Your foot decides the shoe, not you. Do it the other way around and you’ll never habe happy climbing feet.

    I’m 11 US and currently mostly use…

    La Sportiva Skwama 42/9 (Aggressive bouldering/cave)
    La Sportiva Testarossa 42.5/9.5 (Aggressive lead/cave
    La Sportiva Katana 42/9 (Casual lead and multis)
    Red Chili Voltage 44/10.5 (90% of bouldering)

    I have old Evolvs and Red Chilis for easy gym days or training. Unfortunately I can’t remember what my Shamans were.

    After my second pair of shoes, I never made the mistake of not trying things on first. I also stick to my main three brands as they seem to be best for my feet. Your feet decide your brand.

    Edit: I’ve also been advised Tanaya should be really good for me, but haven’t tried any as they’re a bit hard to source here to try on.

    (Commenting from my other account)

    Wow thanks for the detailed advice. The toe issue I’m having is both with the toenails, which feel like they’re being pressed in a lot, and also with the knuckles above them, which feel like they’re being bent too much, as the joints feel sore after wearing the shoes.

    I do clip my nails short every time I climb, but yeah, the top of the big toenails do hurt still, especially on slabs/footwork-heavy climbs, where I’m tip-toeing a lot.

    I’ll have to try that taping trick and see if that helps with the big toe knuckle. There’s definitely too little room as I’ve started getting calluses above my big toes, from where the skin above the joint is just pressed too tightly against the inside of the shoe. I might try that warm water in a bucket tip if things don’t improve, but I’m hesitant to as I can’t imagine that would be too good for the longevity of the shoes.

    I think I’ll definitely have to try on the shoes longer next time I buy a pair and give more weight on what really feels best rather than other criteria like price and pre-conceptions when picking them out.

    It’s interesting you mentioned ballet. I was thinking the other day how good ballet dancers would perform on slabs if they tried climbing on them as they seem to have really great control of their bodies’ balance and footwork. It’d be interesting to see them try it out. I imagine there’s a lot of cross-over with the muscles, joints and movements being trained.

  • (Commenting from my other account)

    Wow thanks for the detailed advice. The toe issue I’m having is both with the toenails, which feel like they’re being pressed in a lot, and also with the knuckles above them, which feel like they’re being bent too much, as the joints feel sore after wearing the shoes.

    I do clip my nails short every time I climb, but yeah, the top of the big toenails do hurt still, especially on slabs/footwork-heavy climbs, where I’m tip-toeing a lot.

    I’ll have to try that taping trick and see if that helps with the big toe knuckle. There’s definitely too little room as I’ve started getting calluses above my big toes, from where the skin above the joint is just pressed too tightly against the inside of the shoe. I might try that warm water in a bucket tip if things don’t improve, but I’m hesitant to as I can’t imagine that would be too good for the longevity of the shoes.

    I think I’ll definitely have to try on the shoes longer next time I buy a pair and give more weight on what really feels best rather than other criteria like price and pre-conceptions when picking them out.

    It’s interesting you mentioned ballet. I was thinking the other day how good ballet dancers would perform on slabs if they tried climbing on them as they seem to have really great control of their bodies’ balance and footwork. It’d be interesting to see them try it out. I imagine there’s a lot of cross-over with the muscles, joints and movements being trained.

    Sounds like you need another set of shoes. Not as a replacement, but as your all-rounder. And it sounds like the Shamans are your high grade shoe you whip out when you want to work something hard. You said you were quite new to climbing, so aggressive shoes may be physically too much to have on all the time at the moment. But they will rapidly teach you new techniques and improve your climbing in the beginning because they allow a lot more.

    I’d definitely recommend the Red Chili Voltages if you can try them on first to confirm. I had a friend rave about them, so I tried them on, and holy shit… A fantastic comfortable all-rounder for bouldering in and outdoors. Quite a few of my crew have converted and now preach the same. I thought Solutions were my fav bouldering shoe until I tried the Skwamas and now the Skwamas only come out for really hard grade.

    If you’re really enjoying slab, you will definitely hurt your toes much more than normal climbing. No way around that. You need those toes scrunched up in the toe box so you can do precise placements on tiny spots—theres no comfy option. My partner says, “Climbing is dancing with gravity and slab is the ballet.” It’s her preferred style and she switches between Shamans for boulder and Katanas for lead or easy boulder.

    If you can only afford one more pair and will stick to only bouldering, I’d avoid laces and get a strap shoe that suits your foot instead. Laces are very annoying bouldering. Really, you should aim for laces if you’ll also be using them on single pitches where a 5min climb can turn into 20 after tying in, leading, anchoring, cleaning, and rappelling, thankful you’re not wearing your top-end binding boulder shoes.

    For the taping trick—marbles is another good one shoved in with packaging in the shoe—just Google “climbing shoe hotspots” and you’ll get good info 🙂

  • devnullD devnull moved this topic from Uncategorized on 16 Sept 2024, 19:55

3/7

17 May 2024, 19:37

Suggested topics


  • 0 Votes
    1 Posts
    31 Views
    How would you describe the scope of the work that goes into making the American Alpine Journal (AAJ)? Dougald MacDonald: Producing the AA J is a year-round effort that involves literally hundreds of people. The actual “staff” of the AAJ (who are all part-timers and volunteers) includes more than 15 people, and each year we work with roughly 300 individual climbers and photographers to share their stories. The book goes to press in late April, so the peak of the cycle is in March and April. But the work on the following year’s edition starts immediately, plus we prepare and upload online stories all year round. AND we produce The Cutting Edge podcast and the monthly Line newsletter. What’s the history of the AAJ? How has it changed over the years? DM: The AAJ is coming up on its 100th birthday, and unsurprisingly it has changed quite a lot over the years. It started out as much more of a Club publication, telling the stories of AAC members’ adventures. In the 1950s, with the rise of Himalayan climbing, the book started to become much more international. But it was really Ad Carter—who edited the AAJ for 35 years, starting in the 1960s—who created the wide-ranging, international publication it is today. We no longer focus mostly on the activities of AAC members—though we’re very happy to tell those stories when we can—but instead try to document all significant long routes and mountain exploration anywhere in the world, by climbers from every country. For both the AAJ and Accidents in North American Climbing (ANAC), the most significant changes of the last 10 to 15 years have been 1) the introduction of color photography throughout both books and 2) the launch of the searchable online database of every AAJ and ANAC article ever published. What’s an example of a unique challenge the editors have to deal with when making the AAJ? DM: One challenge is that we come out so long after many of the climbs actually happened. So, readers may have seen something about any given climb several times, in news reports and social media posts and even video productions. But the AAJ has never been in the breaking news business. Instead, we aim to provide perspective and context. Perspective in that we don’t have any vested interest that might slant a story one way or another, and context on the history and geography that helps readers really understand the significance of a climb, how it relates to what’s been done before, and what other opportunities might be out there. Another big challenge is language barriers, since we work with people from all over the world. We’re fortunate to work in English, which so many people around the world use these days. We also use skilled translators for some stories, and online translation tools have improved dramatically in recent years. But there’s still a lot of back-and-forth with authors to ensure we’re getting everything just right. What’s an example report that was really exciting for you to edit from the last few years? DM: For me, personally, the coolest stories are the ones that teach me about an area of the world—or a moment in climbing history—that I knew nothing about before starting to work on a story. In the upcoming book, for example, we have stories about winter climbing in Greece (who knew?) and a mountain range in Venezuela that’s gorgeous and has peaks over 16,000 feet. Unfortunately, that range is rapidly losing its snow cover and its small glaciers. AAJ senior editor Lindsay Griffin, who is editing the story, did some cool climbs in the range in 1985, and the difference between his photos and those from today is shocking. Are there any big differences in process between making the AAJ and ANAC? DM: The biggest differences are just the scale and scope of the two books: The AAJ is a nearly 400-page book that tries to cover the entir... https://americanalpineclub.org/news/2025/5/19/guidebook-xivan-interview-with-dougald-macdonald
  • 0 Votes
    1 Posts
    32 Views
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nnpxae8BA9c
  • 0 Votes
    1 Posts
    40 Views
    In the rich caravan of climbers whom we meet at the crags, people come and go. Some, like the flowing of mountain streams, make a daily ritual of their appearance on the stone. Others show up every weekend, while outliers make the scene only once a month, or less. Climbers who’ve shared the bonds of… https://climbingzine.com/rays-red-truck-by-roy-mcclenahan/
  • 0 Votes
    1 Posts
    49 Views
    Think you're good at solving climbing problems on the fly? See if you can figure out this one! https://www.alpinesavvy.com/blog/head-scratcher-can-you-solve-this-rappel-problem
  • 0 Votes
    1 Posts
    56 Views
    Mick Fowler and Victor Saunders have made the first ascent of Yawash Sar in the Karakoram. 40 years after their first trip to Pakistan, Fowler and Saunders returned to the country and climbed the north west face of the 6,258m peak, reaching the... https://www.ukclimbing.com/forums/t.php?n=775219
  • 0 Votes
    1 Posts
    51 Views
    Vintage footage of one of America's great rock climbers on a route that he made the first free ascent of The post Old School Ron Kauk on Yosemite’s Rostrum appeared first on Gripped Magazine. https://gripped.com/video/old-school-ron-kauk-on-yosemites-rostrum/
  • 0 Votes
    1 Posts
    70 Views
    The following report describes an accident at Seneca Rocks, West Virginia. This is a longer form report than what will be published in the 2024 Accidents in North American Climbing. If you are a Partner Level Member or above, the Accidents book will arrive in your mailbox any day. The book is filled with examples of good luck and bad—mainly the latter. This tragic accident occurred on the third pitch of a popular route at Seneca Rocks when a climber with three years of experience took an intentional leader fall. The rope was not running over an edge, his gear was in perfect working order, and his belayer made no mistakes. He expected a safe, albeit long fall. Instead, the rope was severed and he tragically fell to his death. Arthur Kearns, local guide and owner of The Gendarme Climbing Shop and the Seneca Rocks Climbing School, submitted the following report: On August 5, a party of two started up Simple J Malarkey (3 pitches, 5.7). The top of the second pitch ends in a corner alcove with overhanging rock above. At the start of the third pitch, the leader, Danny Gerhart (24), placed a 0.75 Camalot just above the belay, before attempting to climb up and left. Gerhart encountered a wasp’s nest and stepped back down to the belay. He then stepped down and to the right on the ramp that ends the second pitch. This was the sequence most used by other climbers. Gerhart was now about five feet away from the belay. He placed a second 0.75 Camalot before moving up and left to a second alcove, about eight feet above and to the right of the belay. Here, Gerhart placed a #3 Camalot in a shallow, slightly flaring pocket. (This piece was found with both extended and non-extended alpine draws attached.) At this point, he removed the second 0.75 Camalot to prevent excessive rope drag.  Gerhart attempted to move up and right from this stance, which is the most used sequence. This crux section requires the leader to move over a roof on a four-foot-high plaque of rock. Though protection is available, the leader cannot see it until they have committed to the crux, and even then, the placement is behind the climber and at waist level. The handholds here could be described as less than inspiring, as water drains onto them from above, adding a polished feel to the rock. Having found no gear, Gerhart stepped back down to the previous stance and discussed options with the belayer. By then, the sun was peeking over the top, making route-finding more difficult. The climbing team discussed options before Gerhart decided to move up and left. Climbing above the last piece and not finding additional protection, Gerhart called down to the belayer, informing them that he was going to take a deliberate fall (acknowledging it was “going to be a big one”). He then let go and fell around 12 feet before loading the rope. The belayer reported having enough time to take in two to four feet of slack before hearing a very loud “gunshot” as the rope exploded. The belayer never felt the falling climber load the belay, and Gerhart fell approximately 130 feet to the ground.  While numerous climbing parties immediately responded to give aid, the fallen climber passed at the scene.  Evidence points to the rope being cut by the rope-end carabiner (a Petzl Spirit) on the extended alpine draw attached to the #3 Camalot. The carabiner remained attached to the fully extended alpine draw and was situated on a slabby portion of rock just below the Camalot. Fuzzy remains from the rope sheath were found inside the carabiner. No rope sheath material was found on any nearby rock edges or the slabby rock face. Photos from the accident scene show about seven feet of rope extending from the tie-in on Gerhart’s harness. Three to four feet of core was exposed where the rope cut. The individual core bundles were all severed at the same length; this indicates a definitive “cut” versus extended shredding over an edge. Kearns wrote the following analysis: How the carabiner cut the rope is difficult to visualize. But here is my attempt to explain it. The rope leaving the belayer moved up through the first piece and past the slightly overhanging rock above. The overhang included a six-to-eight-inch-wide V-slot that likely inhibited the belay strand from moving laterally to the right. At the time of impact, the belay strand of the rope ... https://americanalpineclub.org/news/2024/9/11/the-prescriptionseptember
  • 0 Votes
    1 Posts
    48 Views
    https://www.climbing.com/news/watch-daniel-woods-nina-williams-compete-in-denvers-civic-center-next-weekend/